Selasa, 23 Februari 2010

Hexagrams for Rock Idols

Carla Bianpoen , Contributor , Jakarta | Thu, 12/10/2009 9:38 AM | Arts & Design


Instant Karma, Yayat Surya’s portrait of John Lennon. Srisasanti Art House catalog
Yayat Surya’s solo exhibition at Srisasanti Art House in South Jakarta comes as an interesting alternative to the usual representation of legendary icons.
While using hexagrams from I-Ching, the ancient Chinese Book of Changes, to visualize Indonesian rock star Iwan Fals and rock band Slank may be surprising, pairing them with Western rock stars sets Yayat apart from any other artist of the kind.
Inspired by Andy Warhol’s paintings of Marilyn Monroe, Elvis Presley, Muhammad Ali and other celebrities, some time in the sixties, artists old and young went on to perpetuate idols like John Lennon, the Beatles, and political figures such as Che Guevara and Mao Zedong in a manner that is commonly called Pop. Even today, the trend is apparent in established and upcoming artists. Some were lured into Pop through sheer fascination, while others –lacking creative inspiration – simply followed the trend for commercial gain.
Yayat (b. 1964), however adds a twist to his solo exhibition titled “Soundtrack” — at the Srisasanti Art House in Jakarta, which is on show until Dec. 20.
He limits himself to depicting legendary icons from the world of popular and rock music, selecting those whose lives and lyrics stood against social or political norms that were either incompatible with their personal stance, or ultimately against the basic principles of human rights.
Even if the lyrics speak of peace and love, they are basically grounded in the spirit of resistance, subversion or rebellion.
Thus, although Yayat’s images derive from Pop, which some find particularly shallow, Yayat gives depth and content that calls for pondering over the deeper meaning.
The images in his “Soundtrack” exhibition are marked by layers of blur where musical notes and words come together in dim colors laying side by side with vibrant hues. At first, one is struck by the lyrics or statements from the iconic rock star in question, which have been chosen to set the tone.

The Notorious Bogeyman, a portrait of Marilyn Manson by Yayat Surya. Srisasanti Art House catalog
The “I believe I am God… I dreamt I was the Antichrist and I believe it” message at the top of The Notorious Bogeyman (Marilyn Manson) painting is an eye catcher. The rest of the work is splattered with text and graphic designs, culminating with another message in a different font: “We will sell our shadow to those who stand within it”.
Breaking the monotony of the texture, a formation of little lines pierces through the upper part of the image.
Similarly, the first of Instant Karma (John Lennon) reads “The trouble with reality is it leaves a lot to the imagination”, with Lennon’s face appearing through a curtain of blurred lines, texts and musical scores.

Visionary, a portrait of Jim Morrison. Srisasanti Art House catalog
Meanwhile, in the Visionary (Jim Morrison), the text “The most important kind of freedom is to be what you really are”, grabs one’s attention.
But more remarkable is the light and darker colors that bring together the two parts of the face, with text on the left side and musical scores filling the right side, all of which can be read as hexagrams symbolizing meanings, characteristics of the yin-yang through (hidden) horizontal lines, where each line is either yang (an unbroken, or solid line), or yin (an open line with a gap in the center).
While the picture of the Indonesian singer and song writer Iwan Fals is covered with text heavily clashing with musical notes and images of the members of Slank, the iconic Indonesian rock band celebrating its 26th year of existence this December, it is the division of colors and the appearance of the eyes that is particularly striking.
According to Yayat, who is a fervent reader of the I Ching and its 64 hexagrams, his entire oeuvre is based on hexagrams, though the viewer may not be aware of it. After delving into the background and lives of the selected rock music idols, Yayat picked the suitable hexagram fitting the life, lyrics or statements of each celebrity, infusing his paintings with the energy that has driven these idols in their creative lives.
Yayat’s paintings apply techniques often used in the world of music, such as sampling (using the original voice of somebody else for one’s own song) or remixing. Some of the paintings appear as a combination of several parts of a cover design to create something new. According to Anton Larentz, the curator of the show, his work could be called Post-Pop.
But Yayat also depicts the tragedies that befell some of the superstars such as Michael Jackson, who is famous for his enormous talent but also because of his spectacular strangeness, and whose life was tainted by denials of skin surgery and sexual abuse. The painting Black on White is a portrait without lyrics or musical notes. Michael Jackson’s photograph is superimposed on a badge from the Santa Barbara County sheriff’s department, without makeup, looking plain and a bit tragic.
All of the pop artists Yayat Surya presented have been or are marked by undeniable charisma: Elvis Presley, John Lennon, Michael Jackson, Freddy Mercury, Kurt Cobain, Mick Jagger, Bono U2, Jim Morrison, Janis Joplin, Prince, Marilyn Manson, Miles Davis, Patti Smith, Iwan Fals, and the members of Slank.
It took Yayat two years to research, absorb information on the lives and struggles of the rock stars, and integrate their features using hexagrams in characteristic visual representations. The outcome is a well-cared and prepared show, in which no doubt the curator Anton Larentz who stayed with Yayat for around one year, made a significant contribution. The catalogue that comes with the exhibition includes biographies of Yayat and the rock stars, an excellent curatorial essay. Additional notations by Arief Bagus Prasetyo could well serve as a model.
The only discordant note in “Soundtrack” may be the cold and stiff sculptures featuring pale-colored musical notations set in front of the paintings and marked by flowing lines and energizing colors. But perhaps this is precisely what Yayat wishes to portray, the yin and yang of all things in life.


Soundtrack

Dec. 2-20, 2009
Solo exhibition by Yayat Surya
Srisasanti Art House
Jl. Kemang Raya 81
Kemang
South Jakarta

Press Release “Soundtrack” - Solo Exhibition Yayat Surya

Curator: Anton Larenz

Yayat Surya opens a new chapter in his artistic journey with “Soundtrack”, a new series of paintings and sculptures. The theme-oriented show, presented at Srisasanti Art House, is an expedition into the world of Post-Pop, a colorful trip through the history of pop music and their icons.

Yayat Surya has been known for his Geometrical Art that is influenced by the Eastern symbols of the I-Ching and the Mandala. Now he introduces the symbolism of the I-Ching art into his Pop Art inspired works. After a series of landscape paintings which were as well based on the symbolism of the I-Ching and Mandala, Yayat Surya now explores images of pop musicians. His works tell about their lives and their views of life. They are featuring Elvis Presley, John Lennon, Jim Morrison, Marilyn Manson, Mick Jagger, Miles Davis, Prince, Michael Jackson, Freddie Mercury, Bono, Kurt Cobain, Janis Joplin, Patti Smith, the singer Iwan Fals, and the Indonesian rock band Slank. All of them are known as vocal and critical artists in their own special way, some expressing their protest by words and songs, others by their life style. The choice of two women and two representatives from Indonesia only reflects the power structures in the world of popular music.

All the musicians that have been chosen by Yayat Surya for his Post-Pop portraits represent a strong sense of revolt or rebellion. The artist wants leave the limits of formal Pop Art behind. He considers the Pop Art of Andy Warhol and others as meaningless, as an art without messages – unless as an idolization of materialism and consumerism. The portrayed musicians wanted to comment on society with their songs, so their messages should be understood as important and significant contributions. Yayat Surya is interested in controversial personalities who have influenced generations of music lovers. His objective is to show them in their contrariness as celebrities, living with fame and temptations.

While reviewing the images of rock and jazz musicians, he plays with optical illusion, creating almost psychedelic effects by using pixels as basic units of his portrait painting, with vivid and expressive colors. The paintings integrate different visual elements, the faces of the popular musicians are covered with written original quotations of the stars, taken from interviews and elsewhere. Other visual elements are ubiquitous hexagram of the I-Ching, commenting on the character or a special life situation of the depicted person. Additionally there are excerpts from musical scores, representing songs that are supposed to show the controversial aspects in the messages of rock music. Together these symbols form an exceptional composition of rhythm, color and shape.

The three-dimensional works refer to the realist style of Pop Art, but in an ironical manner. “Hard Rock I-III” is about the obvious machismo in the world of rock music; “Sailor John” shows John Lennon, the man who has written the song “Give Peace a Chance” in a navy uniform.

“Soundtrack” reminds of the transience of art and life; the legacy of a musician are his songs, leaving a soundtrack for future generations. Rock music used to be associated with being young but since these once youthful heroes have aged their music and power still continues.

For the opening of “Soundtrack” Yayat Surya himself will be on stage for a piece of performance art; the “Soundtrack” video clip will be released during the opening as well.

Anyway, it’s all about music…


Senin, 22 Februari 2010

The Living and the Dead Solo Exhibition “Soundtrack” by Yayat Surya

“We are only in it for the money.”
Frank Zappa

“People live in the moment. They don’t factor age into the equation. People want to live for ever, and their heroes to live for ever. If you stand there and say, “I am this person”, it’s not really about who you are, but who you want to be. The Rolling Stones are all still leaping about, but black musicians get older and sit on a stool, sing their blues, and their voices get croaky. And it doesn’t matter.”
Damien Hirst, in conversation with the photographer Rankin

Some afternoon a few months ago,- in the middle of the preparations for the “Soundtrack” exhibition -, Yayat Surya took a trip to a place somewhere outside of Yogyakarta, to a Chinese cemetery not far away from the small town Muntilan in Central Java. This site was proposed by the artist himself as a location for a photo shooting. He wished to experience the special atmosphere of this place. He had already planned to visit that site for a long time, as he later told. Chinese graveyards are known for being built in places with a certain amount of energy (Chi), preferably in an environment or landscape where the two energies Yin and Yang blend together. According to Chinese traditions the living must honor the deceased. Ancestor worship is still a common practice. The graves and tombs should be built in a place conforming to the rules of the Feng Shui which means that they have to be built on sites with special land formations only. If the Qi is very strong within the earth, the land reacts and rises up shaping mountains and hills. Mountains are just an indication or a sign that Qi dwells in and around these places. Qi runs along the mountain ridges all the way to the end where the mountains turn into hills and finally fall off into the plain. Water is often to be found at mountain ends where the Qui gathers and pools where it becomes strongest, when the energies of heaven and earth ideally fuse with each other.
The visit to this cemetery did not happen just by chance or curiosity but because Yayat Surya feels a deep connection with Chinese philosophy since the times when he started to study the principles of the I-Ching (Book of Change) which he integrated as basic symbol into the center of his geometrical paintings. The I-Ching lines appeared in Yayat Surya's paintings along with the symbols of the Mandala that originates from other Asian traditions, - Hinduism and Tibetan Buddhism. The ritual and symbolism is practiced by Buddhism, too.



The artistic journey
Starting from an early period of painting that was essentially influenced by cubism Yayat Surya developed his interest for geometrical arts. First representations of the hexagram already appear in these Cubist paintings. Horizontal lines, with a more ornamental character in the beginning, were combined with cubist figures. Coincidentally this was stylistically his first step toward geometrical arts. At this point the philosophy of the I-Ching was not put explicitly into his visual practice. Finally the six lines of the hexagram or alternately the combination of the three lines of the trigram were transformed into the basic structure of his compositions.
The I-Ching with its philosophy of change became the visually and philosophically dominant concept of his works. His Mandala series together with the I-Ching inspired paintings can be interpreted as an anticipation of the painter's later course of life. The Mandala represents metaphysically or symbolically the cosmos, and the cycle of life, the eternal journey.
Asian Travels
Seen from this perspective it appears as if something he felt drawn to and what he had explored so many times in his thoughts and on the canvas had called him to the land where it originated from. Sometime after finishing these spiritually charged and meaningful works he was invited to Bangladesh, India, China and Nepal where he came into deeper and direct contact with the world of Buddhism. This journey turned into a pilgrimage to the sacred sites and landscapes of Asia which inspired him for the next step in his artistic journey. He was fascinated by the old and new artworks he had seen in these countries. During this journey he began to feel closer with Buddha and Buddhist concepts. Yayat committed himself to start a new project with paintings of Buddha, Kuan Yin, and the Laughing Buddha. Looking back to this period he remarked several times that he had to do this. Quite an artistic change for him again, after working so many years of painting in a nonfigurative style. Yayat Surya wanted to show Buddha as a person, not exclusively as a religious figure. Although we can only wonder how Buddha might actually have looked like. The artist liked being challenged one more time again. Life is change, and art is changing life, too.
The scenery on the Chinese cemetery was somehow reminiscent of this Buddha-period; on several grave sites the well known characters from Chinese legends and mythology were applied as reliefs and painted in vivid colors as ornaments on several tombs and their adjacent walls. Without being disrespectful towards the place the sceneries of Chinese mythology remind of some Pop Art inspired Taoist wonderland. No wonder that an artist who is so attracted by color (and strong in his mastering of color) can find inspiration in this place that has been given to the deceased as their final resting place. On the way from Yogyakarta to Muntilan Yayat Surya had looked very tired because of lack of sleep but as soon as he had entered the Chinese cemetery he felt energized, an indication or sign of good Qi, or Feng Shui, maybe.
Feng Shui and I-Ching are parts of the same Chinese tradition of philosophy, influenced by or integral components of Taoism. Feng Shui was rediscovered as a kind of “earth science” even in the Western world. Consequentially Yayat Surya integrated these concepts into his following period of paintings in his Landscape series. Basically he displays his views about the concept of change, inspired by the I-Ching and, of course, daily life experience which forms an important element of his artistic experience. Exact observation of nature (or the world/environment in general) belongs to the foundations of the traditional Chinese world view and its related philosophical concepts. Seen from this perspective Yayat Surya is an artist who is deeply rooted in Asian thinking.
His landscape paintings were his contribution to the current discussion of climate change, reflecting the (man – made) changes of the environment in a critical way. With gentle colors and flowing lines the painter designed an image of nature that was still shown to a certain extent full of beauty but at the same time already endangered by the threats of the ongoing climate change. Extending deserts with only some flowers left in their center became one of his symbols for the process of nature destruction. Other paintings show red trees (burned by Global Warming) in the middle of green plains of grass.
Commitment to nature, self-awareness and social consciousness are the three pillars of Yayat Surya's work; when he was asked if there is something that is common or behind all his different artworks he remarked that he was always interested in the social life with all the adhering conflicts and changes it takes. He explains that from the beginning of his career as a painter these struggles have been present in his works. Re-balancing and reconciling conflicts can be learned from the I-Ching. Art is a good and appropriate medium to communicate such ideas.
East-West Crossings
Another change has occurred in the creative soul of Yayat Surya who has prepared his new exhibition intensively. It took almost two years time to conceptualize and to produce the new artworks. The “Soundtrack” show consists of 18 paintings and 4 sculptures / installations. It is an expedition into the world of Post-Pop, a colorful trip through the history of pop music and their icons. After a long journey through different artistic periods Yayat Surya has opened again a new chapter in his artistic career. From the subject matter of landscape paintings and the symbols of the I-Ching and Mandala to pop artists now. As objects for his paintings Yayat Surya has chosen musicians who represent for him a strong sense of revolt or rebellion. Rock music is often associated with the once revolting young generations in Western countries like, for example, the hippie culture. Many young people identified themselves totally with that music and the messages that were transported by it. In other parts of the world this development was different, but nevertheless they were also influenced by this music.

This kind of popular music can be considered as a genuine product of the Western world, which definitely means the Anglo-American world. The lyrics of the songs were written in English language and music contributed to establish the English language as the dominating vernacular of the world. “Globalization” by listening to music which transported foreign words to other places and circulated ideas or ideologies, displacing local traditions, languages and cultures or absorbing them – all this could happen to a certain extent by the global emergence of Western popular music. Certainly there are positive and negative aspects in this process, something that could be called dialectical or, if the terminology of the I-Ching is applied – the eternal change or rebalancing.
Fusion, or the mixing of cultural phenomena is a common part of all cultures, syncretism had appeared during all epochs of history. Religion is another field where symbols from different cultures merge or combine. The Chinese cemetery in Muntilan is a place where different religions meet. Some of the grave sites are built according to the Chinese tradition, influenced by Taoism and Buddhism. Others tombs belong to Christian families, following their own symbolism, with crosses and sculptures of angels. It is a place where different belief systems meet and co-exist. Eternal peace and co-existence..
In the arts similar processes have taken place; especially the contemporary art in China was very fascinated by Western Pop Art, but in the local contexts of China the idiom of Pop Art was interpreted differently, seen through the spectaculars of Chinese history.
So how could it happen that an artist like Yayat Surya, - who is definitely shaped by his local Indonesian (or Asian) context and committed to it -, decides to paint Western Pop stars with a style that is also derived from Western Pop Art? When he was asked if he would categorize his art as “Western” or “Eastern”, he answered that his approach is universal, - that he wishes to be understood as somebody with a universal concern. This answer is in a certain sense even “Asian” again because Buddhism for example acknowledges the world as one only. It should be mentioned that Yayat Surya has not grown up within a family with a traditional Chinese cultural background and that he is no Buddhist in a religious sense but as an artist he is open for all kinds of ideas which are fruitful for the arts and for mankind.
So it is not accidental when his choice of musicians as objects for his paintings reflects the structures of power in world of popular music; only two women (Janis Joplin, Patti Smith) and only two representatives from Indonesia – the rock band Slank, often labeled as the Indonesian Rolling Stones, and Iwan Fals who is also known as the Indonesian Bob Dylan.
Pop and Rebellion
The once young and rebellious pop music of the hippie times is often associated with the famous festival in Woodstock that has already passed its 40th anniversary. Art movements like pop art have lost their aura of youthfulness long ago, too. Andy Warhol as the legendary founder of pop art could have celebrated his 81st birthday now, if he would be still alive.

Pop music played by radio stations or at festivals with thousands of people coming there became a carpet of sound which was heard everywhere. Certain pop songs had the potential and power to turn into hymns for social and cultural movements. Like for example Lennon's Give Peace a Chance' for the peace movement, or the protest movement against the war in Vietnam. Songs about rebellion were repeated like mantras and expressed the spirit of a time (Zeitgeist). Each generation created and generated their own soundtrack according to their situation and ideals.
Rock music finally became an integrated part of the big entertainment industry again and its critical appeal almost disappeared. Former rebel musicians turned into respectable millionaires now; for example Mick Jagger who is known for his song “Street Fighting Man', one of the hymns of the 1968 student rebellion in Europe, is an aristocrat now, holding the title “Sir”. Pop music became a machine to make the big money, mainly for the companies but the musicians had learned as well how to get their part of the profit. This might be another parallel with the world of art.
Pop Art replaced the epic with mass-products and the trivial was given prominence. Roy Lichtenstein painted his famous works after scenes taken from comics. No more distinction between ``high art'' and ``low art'', media and advertising were favorite subjects for Pop Art which elevated everyday items the significant and meaningful objects, the consumer society was ultimately idolized. Critics considered this as diminishing the integrity of art through commercialism.
“Pop Life: Art in a Material World”, an exhibition of works by Andy Warhol, Jeff Koons, Damien Hirst, Takashi Murakami and other Pop- and Neo-Pop artists has been opened recently in London. The original title chosen by the curators was “Sold Out! ” which was rejected by one of the participating artists. It sounded too obvious that art was left for money making only. Especially the YBA (Young British Artists – Tracey Emin, Hirst etc.) had a reputation for producing art free of meaning, without any message or public concerns. The cynicism reached its peak when the (successful) sale of an artwork was equated with the artistic content or as important part of the artwork. After the economical crisis had affected the art market many questions came up about the artistic value of many artworks that were once bought for a lot of money. Their economical value reduced immediately after the crisis had started. The conclusion of this debate was that real quality art will always keep its artistic and economical value.
Soundtrack – the flow of music and words
Music is sound, something that we cannot see but hear and feel. For visualization music has to be transformed into symbols like musical notations with clefs and lines. Notation makes reproducing possible. Songs usually have words, and words are being written with letters and fonts.
By assorting many different styles of scripts and fonts, Yayat Surya explores the visual possibilities of writing. Through their manifold forms they open a visual horizon beyond the literal meaning of words and language, sounds (words and music) are converted into pictorial elements. Yayat Surya's painting reveals playfully the field of graphic representation and alludes simultaneously to the history of design in the popular arts by using calligraphical elements and references from album covers. Song lines are written with keys and notation; these signs have a particular visual shape that is seldom used for painting. By combining song lines with written words another dimension is opened for the simultaneous representation of music and text. The visual interplay between these two elements is a characteristic feature of Yayat Surya's works.
The art of album cover design has almost disappeared since records have been replaced by CD's, let alone MP3. Many artists had been asked by musicians to create album covers for their records. Album covers are a lost art, being left for collectors of old records now. Since the old records with their bigger size - alas - have been replaced by digital discs, there was not much space left for the visual designing of musical products. Arts can be transient, too.
The background of “Kind of Black (Miles Davis)” refers to an album cover by Miles Davis ('Live/Evil') that was designed by Matti Klarwein, an artist/painter who became famous for his illustrations for Pop stars like Santana and others. Klarwein was a serious painter and a student of Ernst Fuchs, founder of the school of Phantastic Realism in Vienna The cover for “In Utero” by Kurt Cobain's group Nirvana was done by Alex Grey, a representative of Visionary Realism or Psychedelic Art. The backside showed a collage made by Kurt Cobain. Yayat Surya was inspired by this album cover for his painting “Sleeps With Angels Fly (Kurt Cobain)” which combines the object on the album cover in a dramatic and expressive way with the tragedy of Kurt Cobain's death, creating a new dimension by an almost hallucinatory/psychedelic effect with the expressive red color on the face of Kurt Cobain. Yayat Surya's paintings evoke effects similar to psychedelic light machines formerly used in discotheques; the eye is led astray by optical illusion. Seen from a distance the shape of the faces appear in their full extent.
Yayat Surya has applied techniques that are used often now in the world of music: similar to sampling (using the original voice of somebody else for an own song) or remix Yayat Surya has integrated Alex Grey's cover design, combining different parts to create something new. This can be called 'Post-Pop', free in the use of quotation and references, but leaving the meaningless/message-free period of Pop art behind, refilling meaning again and putting it into a new context.
“When I'm 64 (Mick Jagger)” is not only mocking Mick Jagger's age but actually quoting one of the secrets of artistic production: “It's such a mishmash… “ That's how Jagger answered how he got his ideas write the song “Brown Sugar”, a song that mixes up the complete combination of (dirty) sex, drugs and racism. The Rolling Stones have considered themselves as white musicians who have learned so much from the black Blues singers and guitarists. For creating something new it needs the courage to bring unusual things together. Total remix.
Gender Crossing
Androgyny has been an important figure for rock and pop since the 1950's, Mick Jagger for example with his effeminate charm combined masculinity with a girlish attitude. Rock superstar Elvis Presley became one of the first androgynous icons. And others like David Bowie and Mick Jagger cultivated the same. Jagger commented: “Elvis was very androgynous. People in the older generation were afraid of Elvis because of this. That was one of the things they saw in Elvis. They called it effeminate. And they saw it straightaway. I saw Elvis as a rock singer, and obviously you were attracted to him because he was a good-looking guy. But they saw an effeminate guy. I mean, if you look at the pictures, the eyes are done with makeup, and everything's perfect.”

Like Elvis, Jagger used his body to excite the fans either sexually or agressively, Music writer Sheryl Garratt states, "Androgyny is what they want; men they can identify with as well as drool over...a touch of homosexuality seems to enhance a male star's popularity with women." The Stones used androgyny not because it came naturally, but more so to provoke their opponents. It became a weapon for rebellion and they were the first to use it that way.
Kurt Cobain as a vocal opponent of sexism, racism and homophobia was publicly proud that Nirvana had played at a gay rights benefit. Sometimes he liked to wear he dresses of his wife. “I definitely feel closer to the feminine side of the human being than I do the male - or the American idea of what a male is supposed to be. Just watch a beer commercial, and you'll see what I mean."
Marilyn Manson uses a female name as stage name and integrates elements of transvestism into his performance. He applies make-up like black eyeliner in his everyday life.
Death and Fame – The Transience
An underlying subject of this exhibition tells about the risks and dangers of a life as rock or pop star: Janis Joplin, , Elvis Presley, Freddy Mercury, Jim Morrison and Michael Jackson died of causes related to their life styles; Kurt Cobain committed suicide, John Lennon was shot by a madman; in this sample of portrayed musicians who have already died only Miles Davis reached with 65 years a remarkable age before he died, - although still to early -, from a stroke, pneumonia and respiratory failure, remarkable for somebody who had lived such an intense life as a jazz musician as Miles Davis. Charlie Parker, another famous jazz musician of Miles Davis' generation, was only 34 years old when he died. John Coltrane passed at the age of 40. But all of these names have become legends and popular icons and were merchandized. Some people still do not believe that their heroes of popular music really have died. There are still rumors that Jim Morrison lives on an island in the Southern Seas or in Africa.
The other musicians presented here on canvas are still performing and touring, although most of them have reached an age that cannot be directly identified with the spirit of youth anymore. Mick Jagger has passed his 66th birthday and Patti Smith, the “Godmother of Punk” is 62 years old now. Prince (born 1958), Bono (born 1960) and Marilyn Manson (born 1969) as well as the musicians from Indonesia like Iwan Fals (born 1961) and two members of the group Slank have passed the magical borderline of forty (Slank musician Bimbim 42 years old, Abdee is 41, Kaka and the other members of Slank are now in their late thirties). The amazing point is that they still can attract many fans from the younger generations. Do you remember the line from the Stones song Mother's little helpers: “What a drag it is getting old…” but obviously it is not about age, as long energy and spirit keeps them going.
Life is but transient; the death of rock, pop or movie stars transforms the most famous (or tragic) ones into icons and makes them immortal.


Pop Art and Iconization
Yayat Surya views his art as a medium to communicate something that could be controversial. The old Chinese Book of Change (I-Ching) is at the center of his philosophy of life and art and the hexagrams/trigrams in the paintings characterize the person being portrayed. Change implies often struggles and controversies, harmonization and balancing are necessary for keeping life more stable.
From the beginning of his career he was concerned with the social life of his own society, engaging himself as a responsible artist in causes like climate change or cultural activities (see interview in this catalog: “Cultural Activism”). So he tells now about life and death, eternity and transience, tragic and the power of life-giving music… about fame and failure.
His current works can be read for a certain part as a history of pop music (although he would not claim that it is complete now). But it can also be understood as a history of portrait painting, with references to different styles and techniques of depicting the human face. “The Visionary (Jim Morrison) reminds of a Holy Man, or a saint from ancient times, the right side of the painting refers to the old icon style, to the paintings that were used for prayer and meditation in Old Russia; the lines on Morrison's face and the darker color enhance the aura of broken and old canvas. The other part of the painting is bright, light green and structured by lines. According to Yayat Surya it displays again the principles of the I-Ching: light and darkness, order and chaos.
Andy Warhol's works have certainly been the benchmark for pop art portraits, but Yayat Surya goes much deeper in his interpretation of pop art and portrait painting. His paintings are based on photos of pop musicians, collected from press material or magazines, often taken by well known rock photographers, for example the photograph of Patti Smith by Annie Leibovitz. The best photos support the image of a star and could even produce a mythical value. Barbara Kruger wrote: " …(photos) freeze moments, create prominence and make history."
Yayat Surya dissolves the photographic image into pixels and covers the quotations from song texts and original interview comments of the portrayed musicians. Some of his paintings use a different style, more realist, but they are allusions to the culture of cartoons, another popular art - for example in “When Nightmares Come True” (Michael Jackson). He had done a lot of research for this project, looking for biographical information of the musicians so that he could delve into their images. The man and the image is not the same, as Elvis Presley once remarked. But artists might have a better antenna for sensing somebody else's aura. Yayat Surya records his impressions of persons and their characters for us on canvas, supported by the words of the living and the dead, voices from the grave and from the living world.
Social comments on issues like racism (Prince; Miles Davis) or the entertainment industry (Patti Smith; Freddy Mercury; Prince again) are prevalent. Generally they represent the artists in their controversies with society or their life situation. The painting of the shock-rocker Marilyn Manson tells about the high school murder at Columbine, Little Springs. Manson was summoned because he was suspected as “spiritual leader” of the high school killers. His answer was to produce a video with 15 tombs which are symbolized in “The Notorious Bogeyman (Marilyn Manson) as the crosses lined up as I-Ching hexagrams. 13 people were killed in the incident and the two perpetrators finally committed suicide. Manson's comment was that he also wanted to know what the two killers thought. So he included them among the tombs in his video.
The texts on the paintings can be read and understood literally, exposing the concerned persons in their ambivalence and ambiguity. They are messages, or just remarks. The reader or beholder are asked to interpret them in their contrariness.
The Three Dimensions
Yayat Surya's show presents three sections: musician portraits, the document series and sculptures. The portrait series exposes colorful and more expressive paintings, but they are combined with paintings that are composed with more subdued colors in accordance with Yayat Surya's concept derived from the I-Ching. Darkness evokes brightness, chaos has to be balanced with order. Yayat Surya is an accomplished colorist and here at the top of his art.
The document series gives a different idea how images or photographs are used and function in our daily lives. Usually the photographs taken for official uses are not chosen by aesthetical reasons. They are functional and technical, underlying technological changes as well. So they develop their own historicity, but they show us a quite different picture of a pop star than we are used to. It is not only the photograph that gives a more real, or even strange picture of a person, but the actual hand writing or signature as well which comes closest to authenticity and realness, an aspect that is often missing in press photographs or movie pictures. The document series speaks about the more private and individual aspects of the portrayed persons, outside of their life as objects of celebrity cult.
One of the most moving paintings in this exhibition depicts the farewell letter by Kurt Cobain before he shot himself with a gun. The painting quotes from the original text of the letter and some of the last words of Kurt Cobain are painted like his original handwriting. The Michael Jackson photograph on the document of the Santa Barbara Police Department shows a person in confusion – the interrogation was a turning point in Jacko's life. John Lennon's Green Card is a strong narrative about (and the final chapter in) his long struggle with FBI and CIA about his immigration permit in the United States where he had to face many difficulties because of his assumed political activities, including support of the separatist IRA (Irish Republican Army). About Elvis and his driving licence? For a while he had worked as truck driver before his career skyrocketed.
In the sculpture section pop musician's life are presented in a more satiric way. “Seattle Blues” shows a different perception of Kurt Cobain's suicide, killing himself a la Samurai but by using a electric guitar instead of a sword. John Lennon (“Sailor John”) joins the navy in a new, fresh uniform, but does not want to leave his guitar at home. “Hard Rock I-III with the enlarged male genitals symbolizes the machismo in the world of rock music. The objects are painted in soft pop colors. But if an “instrument” is jammed and does not function anymore (“Cry for Freedom”), it is certainly a painful experience. Male sexuality is often exposed by rock musicians, emphasizing their masculinity on stage. Marilyn was known for mocking sexual intercourse during his stage performances, Mick Jagger and Freddy Mercury put also a lot of stress into showing themselves as machos. Jim Morrison was reported for masturbating in front of his audience (this story was never completely confirmed, according to reports he was completely drunk during that gig). Sometimes one could assume that rock concerts have replaced archaic rituals which were connected with sexuality. The old triad of Sex and Drugs and Rock'n Roll was not far from reality in many musicians' life, and some had to pay a very high price for it.
Going Home
When the excursion to the Chinese cemetery was finished Yayat Surya bowed his head in front of a grave site where the pictures of him were taken, paying respect to the deceased. So he had done with the deceased and the living that are presented here in his artworks. Co-existence between the living and the deceased is acknowledged by the Chinese ancestor worship. If the musicians are already dead or still alive, they will leave their legacy to us: their voices and their songs as a soundtrack for our life.
To us as the beholders of Soundtrack is being left to pay respect to this brave endeavor by a matured artist.
REJECTING THE SWALLOWNESS
Yayat Surya Reviews Pop Heroes

By Arief Bagus Prasetyo
See, you have to listen. People are not used to listening. In class I make them listen, read texts, watch videos and through Elvis we actually pay attention to the seriousness of popular culture, pop music…and listening we learn to transform it….
- Peter Nazareth
The quotation above was taken from an interview by Keith Morrison with Peter Nazareth in Canada AM on March 24th, 1993. Peter Nazareth is currently professor of English Literature and African-American World Studies, also staff of the International Writing Program at the University of Iowa, USA. The interview was conducted in relation with his unique field of study. Maybe in January 1992 he was the only academic in the whole world doing research on the legendary pop star Elvis Presley. His unusual subject took the public by surprise. More than 50 radio and TV stations interviewed Peter Nazareth and more than 400 million people listened to him.
Having researched in one of the best universities of the United States, Peter Nazareth practically rejected with his “Elvis Studies” the “shallow” and banal image that people generally associate with mass cultural phenomena and popular culture, - pop music in particular. His studies showed that pop music and culture are culturally significant and should be studied seriously. For Nazareth it was no self-contradiction that Elvis “was a rock and roll singer who wanted to sing like Dean Martin, but who also listened to and sang like Clyde McPhatter, Jackie Wilson, Little Richard, Mario Lanza, Lowell Fulson, Bill Monroe, Bing Crosby, Nat King Cole, Jerry Reed, Ivory Joe Hunter, Tony Joe White, LaVern Baker, and Mahalia Jackson.” Furthermore, Elvis was an inspiration: “He held the clue to open a door, directed to America, and he removed the obstacles that still existed for the struggle for racial equality which was then on the rise and heading for all corners of the world”.
Just like Peter Nazareth, Yayat Surya repudiates this assertion of the supposed shallowness and banality of pop music. Yayat's advanced artwork presents legendary pop artists, both local and foreign: Elvis Presley, John Lennon, Michael Jackson, Freddy Mercury, Kurt Cobain, Mick Jagger, Bono U2, Jim Morrison, Janis Joplin, Prince, Marylin Manson, Miles Davis, Patti Smith, Iwan Fals, and the members of the rock band Slank. He wants to reject the label of “shallowness/banality” that is attached to pop music; this is clearly recognizable in the choice of the famous rock musicians he wants to represent. He did not choose them by chance. He only picked those who are known as “revolutionary” or “rebellious”. All of them are considered as musicians who are influential and charismatic because they represent the spirit of resistance, subversion, and of a certain rebellion, either with their music, song lyrics, verbal statements, appearance, and behavior, or with their life style as well.
A position that underestimates the value of pop music has been formulated by Theodor Adorno, a prominent philosopher of the Frankfurt school. He compared the “light” (pop) music, which he supposed as worthless, with the more “serious” (classical) music that he assumed to be highly valuable. Adorno believed that classical music perpetuated its quality without plummeting into manipulation. Pop music is abandoned and destined to be manipulated by the market and does not care about aesthetic quality. Because pop music is a slave of the market that only follows public taste and commercialism, pop music is supposed to be conformist only. So it could never be considered as potentially revolutionary. According to Adorno's judgment, revolutionary music belongs to the realm of composers like Schoenberg. Adorno believed that Schoenberg was “a prophet who calls lonely in the desert”, a composer who did not care about market concerns, creating music while being surrounded by musical commercialism.
It is true that the quality of pop music always was debatable. However, it is also clear that the pop music criticized by Adorno generates a strong mass of followers that has an immense potential to change the course of times. Unlike classical music, the revolutionary energy of pop music is not implied only in the music itself but also includes an integral possibility to unify the music and the artist with the masses of fans. Just by this conformity that diminishes the public taste, pop music is able to cause a critical, non-conformist attitude against the status quo and cultural domination, and the arrogant, corrupt and repressive hegemonial power.
Most of the personalities in Yayat's works are pop music icons who deal with the counter-culture. They were controversial superstars that rise up the power of counter-hegemonic pop. They were praised (or criticized) not only for their quality as musicians but also because they have become symbols of rebellion and of being anti-establishment, particularly among the young generation. According to Stuart Hall and Paddy Whannel, pop music represents “emotional realism” that can be utilized by the young generation to identify with, and to differentiate between their world and those of the adults. These are the reasons why pop music has a high potential as a medium to express rebellion and massive social non-conformity.
The potential of being a medium for rebellion, supported by strong base of people reinforces the political dimension of pop music. This political dimension was implied by Yayat's decision to choose two national music pop superstars: Iwan Fals and Slank. Those names were phenomenal in the nation's pop music history, thanks to their critical view of the repressive political culture under the military-backed New Order regime. Their humble and honest lyrics were seen as a challenge to the New Order political regime language. The New Order regime was polluted by euphemism and hypocrisy. Iwan criticized the ruler through his humble and stinging songs; he was very close to the common people. Slank protested through their “don't care much about” performances that upset the New Order stability and tyranny doctrine. The painting called “The Politician (Bono)” depicts Bono, the front man of the band U2, who is also political activist. This painting refers to their controversial song 'Sunday, Bloody Sunday', which at first was supposed to praise the separatist Irish Republican Army. In his concerts Bono was always concerned to criticize sharply what he regards as non-humanitarian politics, while the Irish–American fans continued to shout enthusiastically “War will come here again”.
Yayat rejects the view of Pop music that categorizes this music as “light-weight” or just considers pop music as pure “entertainment. Furthermore Yayat has picked superstars who are involved with pop music in a total and militant way. They live in and live from a world of pop music that has turned into their existential fighting arena where not only worldly pleasures are promised. It is also a world full of deceptions and dangers. They surrender completely to this world; they only strive for playing their music and indulging the sensations of their audiences with their creativity. Often they break social rules and norms, and enter the space of perversion and madness while being threatened with imprisonment and death. Some of them even paid a high price, even with the tragical loss of their life, becoming a victim of public hysteria and hedonistic illusion. John Lenon was shot to death by a fanatic fan. Kurt Cobain shot himself. Freddy Mercury was killed by HIV. “Maybe my audiences can enjoy my music more if they think I'm destroying myself ”, said Janis Joplin as quoted in the painting “White Woman Blues (Janis Joplin)”. It was a tragic, revolutionary statement that celebrated self-destruction as a common price to satisfy people's desire for entertainment.
Though popular musical creativity often is followed by eccentricity and criticism, the superstars painted by Yayat nevertheless inspire changes and emancipation or a cultural revolution. Their energy encourages the audiences to have the audacity to say “I have to change.” As it is printed boldly with that sentence in the painting “Kind of Black (Miles Davis)”. Revolutionary spirit leaves them adored as heroes by millions of fans. However at the same time they have to accept the risk to become the object of an untamed cult by the masses. Adorno could appreciate Schoenberg as a revolutionary musician, whose work “embraces all the darkness and sin of the world”. However, for the most people who listen to music, these pop music superstars are the true revolutionaries. They are the heroes who are ready to be crucified on the altar of the mass culture, to pay for the sins of the crowds, in a world that is so hard and cruel.
Words, Visual Word
Displaying texts is the most important strategy that was used by Yayat to renounce the categorization of pop music phenomena as shallow. Words are the most important visual element in most of Yayat paintings. In general the images in Yayat's canvas are divided into two main components. The image of the pop music superstar and words are conveyed by the musicians either with their lyrics or their statements, being written or spoken comments. In some paintings, the portraits and the words are supplemented with musical symbols that are relevant for the person that is being painted.
The words in Yayat's painting reveal a complex relation between the alleged “decadency” of pop music (or the musicians) and the “seriousness” of the problems they address. For sure, Yayat's paintings cannot reproduce the superstars' sound of music. However, just the absence of musical sound forces the beholder to focus the attention on the words in the paintings. It is a “curtain of texts” that reveals the emotion and intellectual depth. Those superstars with messy clothing, disorderly lifestyle, and abnormal behavior eventually appear as persons who are very concerned about serious issues and essential human values. Through song lyrics and personal statements they comment on freedom, eternity, politics and economy, existential loneliness, godliness, and others. In the painting called “The Notorious Bogeyman (Marilyn Manson)” the words of the brutal and satanic rock star Maryln Manson have strong spiritual vibes. His statements “I believe I am God” sounds similar with the controversial statement uttered by Al-Hallaj. The function of the words in Yayat's paintings works to deepen their meanings.
However the strategy of extracting meanings by exposing words in the painting is not without problems. Yayat's strategy demands double literacy from the audience. The beholder is expected to have visual and verbal awareness. They should know about the context of the superstar who is visualized on the canvas and they must be able and willing to read the text that is attached to it. The domination of words in Yayat's painting forces the viewers to be a reader at the same time. They are expected to be able to move between verbal and visual literacy. It can be assumed that the beholders are familiar with the musician painted by Yayat. However it is possible that the viewers do not like or understand the language that is used by Yayat to write the text fragments in his paintings.
Yayat overcomes these problems by applying a visual-artistic manipulation to the words he painted. The words are treated as visual elements and develop their own esthetic power so that everybody can enjoy them without the necessity to really understand the verbal meaning. Yayat adopted various kinds of techniques that are applied in advertising; such as lettering, choosing fonts, typography, positioning, coloring and others in painting the text. In general Yayat uses the principles of graphic design to a maximum extent, for compounding and fusing the words with the faces in his paintings.
In his paintings Yayat replaces the voice of the singer by using words and the music, which is not to possible to be heard, with the singers' shape. Yayat's painting presents words in the middle of dynamic play with shape and affective presentation. The shapes put the words into a scene of a visual field that animates the language, which makes it colorful and powerful. The words resonate and give a touch of fantasy to their meanings. Language suddenly appears more open. If the viewers can not understand the meaning of words, they could nevertheless enjoy the outward appearance of the words and feel the esthetic sensation that is arising on the stage of art.
Yayat created an art out of compounding a mixture of image and text. The paintings explore the flexible, experimental and “high-tension” connections between words and art. Through his paintings Yayat invites the viewer to signify meanings and in the same time to blend with the dynamics of a “music of form”. It is an invitation for understanding (insights) and pleasure (jouissance).
Image, Screen, I Ching, Pop Art
Most people never met the celebrities in person as a concrete and humanly individual, with all their human features. The public knows them from audio and audio-visual recording, stage show, cassette cover, interviews, news, and gossips in the media. The fans never met with the real Elvis, they have only consumed the image of Elvis. “Marilyn Manson did not want to be photographed without his eerie makeup”, said Yayat. In reality, what is known from artists is their image, the illusion, - a warped product of the image-making technology. People's fantasy is ruined by the cultural industry.
Yayat emphasizes the essential nature of the “celebrity as an image” by the way he painted the pop music heroes in his paintings. Most of the figures on his canvas are shaped as constructions from separate areas that are compounded by pixel formations. It reminds us strongly of the images resulting from the technology of digital imaging. With this approach Yayat wants to tell us that people have never seen directly the reality of a celebrity because there is always a technology in-between, there is no direct connection between the subject that views, and the object that is viewed. The public consumes only artificial images: practically the result of reproduction and digital manipulation, ready to be re-produced and manipulated continuously.

The illusive character from these celebrities appears clearly when Yayat's paintings are seen from another distance. Like a fata morgana, the face of the superstar can be seen clearly when the audience sees the paintings from the distance. However when the viewer approaches the painting, the faces will slowly “disappear” and change into an abstract configuration of various fields of dark-bright areas. Yayat isolates the pop music heroes in the virtual reality space. A quote by William Gibson says, it is “a hallucinatory space produced by computer graphic imaging”. Yayat's paintings mirror the words of Steve Aukstakalnis and David Blatner, “the way humans visualize, manipulate, and interact with computer and complex data.”
Yayat's paintings reflect an intensive interrogation towards contemporary culture ruled by images, stimulation, stereotype, illusion, reproduction, imitations, and fantasy. They explore the complexity of the practice of imaging, try the power of imaging in shaping, influence and manipulate the perception of reality. His paintings also perform a critical struggle with the problem of image-making. It also deals with some concepts like “cause and effect affect humans” or “the way we see” in the era of digital technology imaging.
Yayat's reflection about the culture of imaging suggests a parallel line between the field of the painting and the electronic screen. The characters on the electronic screen, television, narrate the world without to stop. Electronic screens awaken the desire to narrate, the desire to tell about everything - political maneuver, sex scandal, family matters, natural disaster, cooking, and more. As told by David Michel Levin, electronic screens are predators which consume greedily any reality to be narrated. The strong will to narrate was presented in Yayat's paintings by the aggressive text intervention into the pictorial space. It looks as if the words interrupt the viewer while exploring the painting.
Similar to the image on the electronic screen, the image in Yayat's painting portrays the hybridization of an image. The principle of interconnection builds a complex network of images where various visual entities (portrait, alphabet, symbol, line, space, color field, and more) touch each other, overlap and slice. Similar to the internet web character the image net in Yayat's image is open, enables the process of boundary penetration, mixing, blending, crossing, and merging. It creates heterogeneous spaces filled with crossings and diffusion: a multiplicity of images.
The electronic screen signifies a multiple image. Just like a computer or television screen, Yayat's canvas illustrates multiple visual image formed by changes and repetitions of visual elements such as lines, shape, field and color. The images look different from one canvas to another. However, they are formed from the same “pixels”. The same alphabets form different meanings and word presentations. The lines and colors are repeated with various ways.
The paradox of repetitions-changes or differences-similarities mark an impressive phase in Yayat's creative explorations about the I Ching, the Book of Change from ancient China. Already some years ago the I Ching became the source of Yayat's creative inspiration. It embodies ways of anticipating changes/differences by relying on repetition/similarity. The same lines are repeated in different ways, forming 64 hexagrams that are correlated with 64 potential changes which can be interpreted freely. In some of Yayat's new paintings the I Ching is visually still present. However, their presence is hidden and encoded in the configuration of various images depicted in the paintings, for example in texts or music partiture.
Unlike his early works, Yayat's new paintings lean towards the Pop Art trend. The celebrities he painted are similar to those of Andy Warhol's, for example Elvis. Lucy Lippard noted that the conjunction of words and images represents essentially the characteristics of Pop Art. Just like in Pop Art paintings, Yayat's paintings present only very little of images that results of his direct observation. Yayat did not re-create, he chose from the pictures of pop music stars which already exist. He did not paint Kurt Cobain. Instead he chose the picture of Kurt Cobain that could be found in the cover of a cassette, magazine, T-Shirt, Internet, and others.
Even though Yayat explores Pop Art, his attitude was different from the Pop Art artists. As quoted by Edward Lucie-Smith that said Pop Art artists celebrate shallowness. “… attack us instantly and declare the meaning out of the sudden. We do not have to look back because it was disposable”. Yayat, in the contrary, seeks deepness. His works continuously ask for attention and contemplation.
Arif Bagus Prasetyo, writer and curator, alumnus of International Writing Program, University of Iowa, USA